/* ----------------------------------------------- Blogger Template Style Name: Rounders 3 Designer: Douglas Bowman URL: www.stopdesign.com Date: 27 Feb 2004 ----------------------------------------------- */
Google

Tuesday, March 02, 2010

Hmm, Florida Science Education takes a step backward

From Bridge for Tomorrow:

Florida House GOP Proposal Would Leave High School Science Behind

Florida House Republican and Speaker hopeful Eric Fresen has filed a bill for next spring’s legislative session that is being touted as a way to raise standards for high school graduation. But in science, Fresen’s bill would leave Florida behind Georgia, Alabama and even Mississippi.

House Bill 61 would require three science courses for graduation, as the law presently does. In one respect, the bill’s provisions on science are an improvement over a bill on graduation standards that Representative Fresen filed last year. Last year’s bill would have allowed a student to graduate from high school without having taken any courses in the physical or Earth sciences, leaving them without any background with which to understand the pressing issues of energy and global climate change. This year’s bill would require students entering high school in 2013 or later to take at least one biology class and at least one class in chemistry or physics. Unfortunately, Earth science is not mentioned in Representative Fresen’s bill.

While HB 61 would set the bar for high school graduation in science at three courses, our neighboring states – Alabama, Georgia and Mississippi – are already requiring four courses in science for graduation. In a recent commentary published in the St. Petersburg Times education blog Gradebook, Republican Representative John Legg, Chairman of the K-12 Education Policy Committee in the Florida House, said that “Our long term economic recovery is dependent on our students’ educational success.” This assertion, which is beyond debate, certainly requires us to be able to compete with our neighbors in the area of science education.

Florida’s standing in science relative to its neighboring states was demonstrated in the recently released results for 2009 high school graduates from the ACT exam, which includes a separate science section (as recently highlighted by Leslie Postal in the Orlando Sentinel’s School Zone blog). While not all of Florida’s high school graduates took the exam, 62% of them did, earning an average score on the science section of the exam of 19.0 (of a possible 36). In Alabama, a larger fraction of the high school graduates took the exam (76%), but as a group they outperformed Florida with an average score of 20.1. In Mississippi, nearly all the high school graduates took the exam (93% vs. Florida’s 62%); nevertheless, that state’s students nearly kept up with Florida with an average score of 18.7. At 20.3, Georgia’s average was the highest in the region, but only 40% of their graduates took the exam. In short, Florida’s high school graduates are not competing well with graduates from our neighboring states in science.

This summer, a group of 90 science faculty from Florida’s colleges and universities drafted a white paper on high school graduation requirements in science. While the professors did not go so far as to propose that four science courses be required for graduation, the group did argue that four science courses should be required for a student to be eligible for a Bright Futures scholarship. Furthermore, the white paper specified that in order to graduate, every student should take at least one biology course, one physical science course (chemistry or physics) and one course in the Earth and space sciences.

Florida competes with Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi for high tech industries, and the scientific skill of our workforce as developed in the K-12 schools is a critical factor in these competitions. We cannot afford to fall further behind.

1 Comments:

At 11:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

3. Three credits in science, two of which must have a 73 laboratory component. Beginning with students entering grade 9 74 in the 2011-2012 school year, one of the three credits must be 75 Biology I or a series of courses equivalent to Biology I as 76 approved by the State Board of Education, one credit must be a 77 physical science or a series of courses equivalent to a physical 78 science as approved by the State Board of Education, and one 79 credit must be a higher-level science course. At least two of 80 the science courses must have a laboratory component. Beginning 81 with students entering grade 9 in the 2013-2014 school year, one 82 of the three credits must be Biology I or a series of courses 83 equivalent to Biology I as approved by the State Board of 84
[next page]
Education, one credit must be chemistry or physics or a series 85 of courses equivalent to chemistry or physics as approved by the 86 State Board of Education, and one credit must be a higher-level 87 science course. At least two of the science courses must have a 88 laboratory component.

( http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h0061__.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=0061&Session=2010 )

I see a requirement for a physical science being replaced with a requirement for physics or chem. After that the student still needs to select a "higher-level" science course.

how many Florida Public School students do you know who are going to pursue BioII, ChemII, or PhysII on their own volition?

most school boards, if they even have an earth science program, will probably bump it into the "higher-level" category.

I know we're not where we want to be, but I don't see this as a step backwards... more like shifting sideways, with a lot of arm waving.

I feel kinda dirty for semi-defending Fresen though...


I better post anonymously.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Locations of visitors to this page